Puts n’ calls, Russia ‘peaking’ & Peking’s shale

Oil market volatility continues unabated indicative of the barmy nature of the world we live in. On January 25, the Brent forward month futures contract spiked above US$113. If the day's intraday price of US$113.46 is used as a cut-off point, then it has risen by 4.3% since Christmas Eve. If you ask what has changed in a month? Well not much! The Algerian terror strike, despite the tragic nature of events, does not fundamentally alter the geopolitical risk premium for 2013.

In fact, many commentators think the risk premium remains broadly neutral and hinged on the question whether or not Iran flares-up. So is a US$113-plus Brent price merited? Not one jot! If you took such a price-level at face value, then yours would be a hugely optimistic view of the global economy, one that it does not merit on the basis of economic survey data.

 

In an interesting note, Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo Bank, gently nudges observers in the direction of examining the put/call ratio. For those who don’t know, in layman terms the ratio measures mass psychology amongst market participants. It is the trading volume of put options divided by the trading volume of call options. (See graph above courtesy of Saxo Bank. Click image to enlarge)

 

When the ratio is relatively high, this means the trading community or shall we say the majority in the trading community expect bearish trends. When the ratio is relatively low, they’re heading-up a bullish path.

 

Hansen observes: “The most popular traded strikes over the five trading days (to January 23) are evenly split between puts and calls. The most traded has been the June 13 Call strike 115 (last US$ 3.13 per barrel), April 13 Call 120 (US$0.61), April 13 Put 100 (US$0.56) and June 13 Put 95 (US$1.32). The hedging of a potential geopolitical spike has been seen through the buying of June 13 Call 130, last traded at US$0.54/barrel.”

 

The Oilholic feels it is prudent to point out that tracking the weekly volume of market puts and calls is a method of gauging the sentiments of majority of traders. Overall, the market can, in the right circumstances, prove a majority of traders wrong. So let’s see how things unfold. Meanwhile, the CME Group said on January 24 that the NYMEX March Brent Crude had made it to the next target of US$112.90/113.29 and topped it, but the failure to break this month’s high "signals weakness in the days to come."

 

The  group also announced a record in daily trading volume for its NYMEX Brent futures contract as trading volumes, using January 18 as a cut-off point, jumped to 30,250 contracts; a 38% increase over the previous record of 21,997 set on August 8, 2012.

 

From the crude oil market to the stock market, where ExxonMobil finally got back its position of being the most valuable publicly traded company on January 25! Apple grabbed the top spot in 2011 from ExxonMobil which the latter had held since 2005. Yours truly does not have shares in either company, but on the basis of sheer consistency in corporate performance, overall value as a creator of jobs and a general contribution to the global economy, one would vote for the oil giant any day over an electronic gadgets manufacturer (Sorry, Apple fans if you feel the Oilholic is oversimplifying the argument).

 

Switching tack to the macro picture, Fitch Ratings says Russian oil production will probably peak in the next few years as gains from new oilfields are offset by falling output from brownfield sites. In a statement on January 22, the ratings agency said production gains that Russia achieved over the last decade were mainly driven by intensive application of new technology, in particular horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing applied to Western Siberian brownfields on a massive scale.

 

"This allowed oil companies to tap previously unreachable reservoirs and dramatically reverse declining production rates at these fields, some of which have been producing oil for several decades. In addition, Russia saw successful launches of several new production areas, including Rosneft's large Eastern Siberian Vankor field in 2009," Fitch notes.

 

However, Fitch says the biggest potential gains from new technology have now been mostly achieved. The latest production figures from the Russian Ministry of Energy show that total crude oil production in the country increased by 1.3% in 2012 to 518 million tons. Russian refinery volumes increased by 4.5% to 266 million tons while exports dropped by 1% to 239 million tons. Russian oil production has increased rapidly from a low of 303 million tons in 1996.

 

"Greenfields are located in inhospitable and remote places and projects therefore require large amounts of capital. We believe oil prices would need to remain above US$100 per barrel and the Russian government would need to provide tax incentives for oil companies to invest in additional Eastern Siberian production," Fitch says.

 

A notable exception is the Caspian Sea shelf where Lukoil, Russia’s second largest oil company, is progressing with its exploration and production programme. The ratings agency does see potential for more joint ventures between Russian and international oil companies in exploring the Russian continental shelf. No doubt, the needs must paradigm, which is very visible elsewhere in the ‘crude’ world, is applicable to the Russians as well.

 

On the very same day as Fitch raised the possibility of Russian production peaking, Peking announced a massive capital spending drive towards shale exploration. Reuters reported that China intends to start its own shale gale as the country’s Ministry of Land and Resources issued exploration rights for 19 shale prospection blocks to 16 firms. Local media suggests most of the exploration rights pertain to shale gas exploration with the 16 firms pledging US$2 billion towards the move.

On the subject of shale and before the news arrived from China, IHS Vice Chairman Daniel Yergin told the World Economic Forum  in Davos that major unconventional opportunities are being identified around the world. "Our research indicates that the shale resource base in China may be larger than in the USA, and we note prospects elsewhere," he added.

 

However, both the Oilholic and the industry veteran and founder of IHS CERA agree that the circumstances which led to and promoted the development of unconventional sources in the USA differ in important aspects from other parts of the world.

“It is still very early days and we believe that it will take several years before significant amounts of unconventional oil and gas begin to appear in other regions,” Yergin said. In fact, the US is benefitting in more ways than one if IHS’ new report Energy and the New Global Industrial Landscape: A Tectonic Shift is to be believed.

In it, IHS forecasts that the "direct, indirect and induced effects" of the surge in nonconventional oil and gas extraction have already added 1.7 million jobs to the US jobs market with 3 million expected by 2020. Furthermore, the surge has also added US$62 billion to federal and state government coffers in 2012 with US$111 billion expected by 2020. (See bar chart above courtesy of IHS. Click image to enlarge)

 

IHS also predicts that non-OPEC supply growth in 2013 will be 1.1 million barrels per day – larger than the growth in global demand – which has happened only four times since 1986. Leading this non-OPEC growth is indeed the surge in unconventional oil in the USA. The report does warn, however, that increases in non-OPEC supply elsewhere in the world could be subject to what has proved to be a recurrent “history of disappointment.”

 

That’s all for the moment folks! Keep reading, keep it ‘crude’!

 

To follow The Oilholic on Twitter click here.

 

© Gaurav Sharma 2013. Graph: Brent Crude – Put/Call ratio © Saxo Bank, Photo: Russian jerry pump jacks © Lukoil, Bar Chart: US jobs growth projection in the unconventional oil & gas sector © IHS 2013.

Talking geopolitics & refineries at Platts event

Following on from earlier conversations with contacts in the trading community about the direction of the Brent crude price versus geopolitics, the Oilholic extended his queries to the Platts Energy Risk Forum, held in London earlier this week. At the event, Dave Ernsberger, global editorial director of oil coverage at Platts, summed-up the market mood as we near the final quarter of 2012 (see graphic above, click to enlarge). “This year has been one of two realities, namely the dire economic climate and upward geopolitical risk. H1 2012 saw anxiety about a war in the Middle East and H2 sees renewed fears of a demand slowdown,” he told delegates.

“The oil price is poised to break away from the mean – but which way? So far it has been chained and shackled in the US$15-20 range either way falling below US$90 and rising above US$115 over the course of this year. The threat of an Iran versus Israel conflict which might draw the US in by default has not gone away. On the other hand a European recession could bring a new oil price crash. Additionally, there is a perception that supply-demand and spare capacity scenarios are not what they are made out to be,” Ernsberger added.

Over a break in proceedings, the Oilholic quizzed the Platts man about the actual influence of the geopolitical or instability premium on the price of the crude stuff and market conjecture about it being broadly neutral for 2013.

“I think the current geopolitical dynamic is fairly well understood at this point. The big touching points which are at play for instance, but not limited to, the US-Iran-Israel issue and the China-Japan and Asia Pacific energy politics have been with us for a while. I feel it is hard to see how those geopolitical arenas will evolve significantly in 2013 because we are at a stalemate point. In a sense, if you look forward they should be neutral,” Ernsberger said.

However, both of us were in agreement that one always needs to be careful about a geopolitical trigger as a single tiny flashpoint could offset the placidness. But from where Ernsberger and the Oilholic sit at present – geopolitical influences are in a kind of suspended animation for next year. The Platts Energy Risk Forum also noted that demand forecasts for 2012 have stabilised and that Chinese demand, on a standalone basis, had slowed considerably. As such, the price outlook for 2013 is overwhelmingly bearish.

One unintended result of the European crisis brings us to another area of interest - refining. Platts noted that the EU-wide recession is speeding up refinery closures. It suggested that 3 to 5 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil refining capacity is under immediate threat of closure or actually did close recently. Additionally, an estimated 7 million bpd needs to close to adjust for more efficient refining in Asia and Middle East. But the closures are lifting refining margins over the short-term in a business that remains volatile (see graphic above right, click to enlarge). Ernsberger also brought forth a very valid observation for the readers of this humble blog – the striking similarity between the survival (or vice versa) statistics within the refining and civil aviation sectors.

“Refining and aviation are two industries where it’s a race to the bottom! There is so much competition in both these industries that basically whatever environment you are operating in – even if you are operating in India or China – it’s a race to the bottom…Typically, what you’ll find is that every company would try and stay in the business as long as it can and will only leave when it runs out of money. It’s also why refining and aviation have more bankruptcies than any other sector I can think of,” he said.

At the same forum, it was also a pleasure running into Dr. Vincent Kaminski, a former Enron executive who repeatedly raised strong objections to the financial practices at the company prior to its scandal-ridden collapse in 2002. In the aftermath of the scandal, Dr. Kaminski was praised for being among the voices of reason at a company riddled with malpractices. (For background read Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind’s brilliant book – The Smartest Guys in the Room)

Dr. Kaminski, who is an academic on the faculty of Houston’s Rice University at present, told the forum that by the time of its collapse Enron had mutated from an energy company to one which traded practically everything and one which was not alone in devising trading strategies based on exploiting geographical constraints.

“Energy markets have evolved over the last 20 years into an integrated global system. Markets for different physical commodities form what can be called a tightly coupled system. While market participants learn and adjust their behaviour in order to survive and prosper in a changing world, the system itself evolves and remains far removed from a stable equilibrium at any point in time,” he added.

Dr. Kaminski also dwelt on the Shale Gas revolution in the US which was decades in the making but transformed the country's energy landscape upon fruition leading to the availability of natural gas in abundance and a dip in gas price-contracts (see graphic on the left, click to enlarge). “As US production sky-rocketed, conventional wisdom about the possibility of LNG shortages barely five years ago was turned on its head. By April 2012 we even noted a sub-US$2/mBtu front-month settlement on the NYMEX,” he added.

Later in the afternoon, Dr. Kaminski told the Oilholic that US LNG import terminals currently being prepped to export gas in wake of the shale bonanza could one day be sending tanker-loads to Europe in direct competition with Qatar and Russia.

“On the flipside for the US consumer, the moment a viable gas export market is established for US gas, the impact on the country’s domestic gas market would be a bullish one. That is the nature of market forces,” he added.

When asked about the prospects of shale prospection in Europe – most notably in Poland, Ukraine, Sweden and the UK – Dr. Kaminski said he was a ‘realist’ rather than a ‘sceptic’. “What happened in the US, did not take place overnight. Technology, legislative facilitation and public will – all played a part and gradually fell into place. I do not see it being replicated in Europe over the short term and certainly not with the speed that some are hoping it would,” he concluded.

Just as the Oilholic was winding down from a discussion on shale with Dr. Kaminski, it seems the UK Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) was talking up the economic benefits of a British Shale Gale! In a policy statement circulated to parliamentarians, the IMechE said shale gas was ‘no silver bullet’ for UK energy security but will provide long-term economic benefits in the shape of thousands of jobs.

Dr. Tim Fox, Head of Energy and Environment at IMechE and lead author of the shale gas policy statement, said, “Shale gas has the potential to give some of the regions hit hardest by the economic downturn a much-needed economic boost. The engineering jobs created will also help the Government’s efforts to rebalance the UK’s skewed economy.”

However, Dr. Fox added that shale gas "is unlikely to have a major impact on energy prices and the possibility that the UK might ever achieve self-sufficiency in gas is remote." 

IMechE projects that 4,200 jobs would be created per year over a ten-year drill programme. The engineering skills developed could then be sold abroad, just as the oil and gas experience built up in North Sea oilfields is now being sold across the world. Well, we shall see but that’s all for the moment folks! Keep reading, keep it ‘crude’!

© Gaurav Sharma 2012. Graphic 1: Platts dated Brent – January 2011 to August 2012 © Platts September 2012. Graphic 2: International cracking margins snapshot © Platts / Turner Mason & Co. September 2012. Graphic 3: US Natural Gas futures contract © Dr. Vincent Kaminski, Rice University, Texas, USA /Bloomberg.

Eurozone crisis vs. a US$100/barrel price floor

In the middle of a Eurozone crisis rapidly evolving into a farcical stalemate over Greece’s prospects, on May 13 Saudi Arabia’s oil minister Ali al-Naimi told a Reuters journalist at an event in Adelaide that he sees US$100 per barrel as a “great price” for crude oil. In wake of the comment, widely reported around the world, barely six days later came confirmation that Saudi production had risen from 9.853 million barrels  per day (bpd) in February to 9.923 bpd in March with the kingdom overtaking Russia as the world's largest oil producer for the first time in six years.

In context, International Energy Forum says Russia's output in March dropped to 9.920 million bpd from 9.943 million bpd in February. The Saudis exported 7.704 million bpd in March versus 7.485 million bpd in February but no official figure was forthcoming from the Russians. What al-Naimi says and how much the Saudis export matters in the best of circumstances but more so in the run-up to a July 1 ban by the European Union of imports of Iranian crude and market theories about how it could strain supplies.

Market sources suggest the Saudis have pumped around 10 million bpd for better parts of the year and claim to have 2.5 million bpd of spare capacity. In fact, in November 2011 production marginally capped the 10 million bpd figure at one coming in at 10.047 million bpd, according to official figures. The day al-Naimi said what price he was comfortable with ICE Brent crude was comfortably above US$110 per barrel. At 10:00 GMT today, Brent is resisting US$106 and WTI US$91. With good measure, OPEC’s basket price stood at US$103.49 last evening and Dubai OQD’s forward month (July) post settlement price for today is at US$103.65.

With exception of the NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil futures contract, the benchmark prices are just above the level described by al-Naimi as great and well above the breakeven price budgeted by Saudi Arabia for its fiscal balance and domestic expenditure as the Oilholic discussed in July.

Greece or no Greece, most in the City remain convinced that the only way is up. Société Générale CIB’s short term forecast (vs. forward prices) suggests Brent, Dubai and even WTI would remain comfortably above US$100 mark. The current problem, says Sucden Financial analyst Myrto Sokou, is one of nervousness down to mixed oil fundamentals, weak US economic data and of course the on-going uncertainty about the future of Eurozone with Greece remaining the main issue until the next election on June 17.

“WTI crude oil breached the US$90 per barrel level earlier this week and tested a low at US$89.28 per barrel but rebounded on Thursday, climbing above US$91 per barrel. Brent oil also retreated sharply to test a low at US$105 per barrel area but easily recovered and corrected higher toward US$107 per barrel. We continue to expect particularly high volatile conditions across the oil market, despite that oil prices still lingering in oversold territory,” she adds.

Not only the Oilholic, but this has left the inimitable T. Boone Pickens, founder of BP Capital Partners, scratching his head too. Speaking last week on CNBC’s US Squawk Box, the industry veteran said, “I see all the fundamentals which suggest that the price goes up. I am long (a little bit) on oil but not much…I do see a really tight market coming up. Now 91 million bpd is what the long term demand is globally and I don’t think it would be easy for the industry to fulfil that demand.”

Pickens believes supply is likely to be short over the long term and the only way to kill demand would be price. Away from pricing, there are a few noteworthy corporate stories on a closing note, starting with Cairn Energy whose board sustained a two-thirds vote against a report of the committee that sets salaries and bonuses for most of its senior staff at its AGM last week.

Earlier this year, shareholders were awarded a windfall dividend in the region of £2 billion following Cairn's hugely successful Indian venture and its subsequent sale. However, following shareholder revolt a plan to reward the chairman, Sir Bill Gammell, with a bonus of over £3 million has been withdrawn. The move does not affect awards for the past year. Wonder if the Greenland adventure, which has yielded little so far, caused them to be so miffed or is it part of a wider trend of shareholder activism?

Meanwhile the FT reports that UK defence contractor Qinetiq is to supply Royal Dutch Shell with fracking monitors. Rounding things up, BP announced a US$400 million spending plan on Wednesday to install pollution controls at its Whiting, Indiana refinery, to allow it to process heavy crude oil from Canada, in a deal with US authorities.

Finally, more than half (58%) of oil & gas sector respondents to a new survey of large global companies – Cross-border M&A: Perspectives on a changing world – conducted by the Economist Intelligent Unit on behalf of Clifford Chance, indicates that the focus of their M&A strategy is on emerging/high-growth economies as opposed to domestic (14%) and global developed markets (29%). The research surveyed nearly 400 companies with annual revenues in excess of US$1 billion from across a range of regions and industry sectors, including the oil & gas sector. That’s all for the moment folks! Keep reading, keep it ‘crude’!

© Gaurav Sharma 2012. Photo: Oil worker in Oman © Royal Dutch Shell.

North Sea, Gaddafi, CFTC (Rhymes not intended)

The past week has been cruder than ever, loads to talk about – not least a bit of good news from the North Sea for a change. Following BP’s earlier announcement on its commitment to offshore west of the Shetland Islands to the tune of £4.5 billion, Statoil recently doubled the estimate of the size of its crude find in the North Sea.

The Norwegian energy major now says the Aldous Major South field, a prospection zone linked to the Avaldsnes field operated by Swedish firm Lundin Petroleum, could contain between 900 million and 1.5 billion barrels of recoverable oil.

While the find is perhaps one of the largest ever discoveries in the North Sea, what is of much more significance is the fact that much of extraction zone is in relatively shallower waters. Admittedly, the find and BP’s move are unlikely to increase British production levels to pre-peak (1999) levels. Nonetheless it is welcome news for a prospection zone, the British end of which has been bemoaning higher taxation and where the only overall bonanza independent observers sometimes see is the one related to decommissioning. (Not that, that’s over.)

From the North Sea to Col. Moammar Gaddafi – whose gory end had a near negligible impact on crude oil futures according to evaluations conducted by several City analysts. The former Libyan dictator was killed by revolutionary forces in his hometown of Sirte last Thursday. Most analysts felt focus had already shifted, following the fall of Tripoli, to restoring Libyan production. In fact damaged oil terminals, already factored in to the pricing strategy and supply/demand permutations, were more of a concern than the Colonel’s demise. As Libya moves forward, what sort of government takes shape remains to be seen.

Continuing with pricing, the ICE Brent forward month futures contract could not hold on to early gains last week and stayed below the US$110 level, but the WTI had a mini rally ending the week above US$87. Today in intraday trading Brent’s flirtation with the US$110 level and WTI’s with US$88 continues with all eyes on the outcome of the EU leaders’ summit on October 26th.

Analysts at Sucden Financial Research, expect some further consolidation in the oil market ahead of the meeting. “Thus, volume might be muted while high volatility and nervous trading are possible to dominate the markets. In the meantime, currencies movements will remain the key driver of oil direction, while it will be interesting to watch how the global equity markets will digest any breaking news,” they wrote in an investment note.

Moving away from pricing but on a related note, the Oilholic found time this weekend to read documents relating to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) 20th open meeting on the Dodd-Frank regulations which approved, on October 18th, amongst other things, the final rule on speculative position limits.

To begin with the Oilholic, along with fellow kindred souls in the world of commodities analysis, wonders how a move designated to impose curbs on ‘excessive speculation’ does not actually define it or explains what constitutes admission to the category of ‘excessive speculation.’

The final ruling, according to the CFTC, will establish ground rules for trading 28 ‘core’ commodity futures contracts and also ‘economically equivalent’ futures, options and swaps. The limits are going to be introduced in two phases.

Wait a minute, it gets ‘better’ – limits for ‘spot-month’ will be introduced after the agency further defines what a ‘swap’ contract is (eh???). It seems there is no strict timeline for that definition to come about but the world’s press has been informed that the definition should come before the end of the year. The trading of four energy contracts will be affected – i.e. NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas, NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil, NYMEX New York Harbor Gasoline Blendstock and NYMEX New York Harbor Heating Oil.

Michael Haigh, analyst at Société Générale CIB notes, “In the short run therefore these rules might not impact price volatility (they still have to define a swap) and we believe the rules will not decrease volatility or stop commodity price spikes down the road. Increased volatility and price spikes are actually more likely in our opinion. The rules will also create a better paper-trail for the CFTC knowing who is holding what and in which market (swap or futures) but legal challenges to the rule are considered likely.”

As for the nitty-gritty, the initial spot month limits will be the CFTC's legacy limits for agricultural commodities (e.g., 600 contracts for corn, wheat and soybeans, 720 for soybean meal and 540 for soybean oil). For other commodities, exchange limits will be applied. Thereafter, spot limits will be based on 25% of the deliverable supply as determined by the exchanges and these will be adjusted every other year for agricultural contracts but each year for metals and energy.

In the second phase, the CFTC will set limits for positions in non-spot contracts (and all months combined) based on open interest. The CFTC should have that data by August 2012. In practical terms, it appears that the all months combined/single month limits will therefore take effect in late 2012 or early 2013 after the CFTC reviews the data, comes up with limits and imposes them.

The CFTC promises to conduct a study 12 months after implementation and would ‘promptly’ address any problems. However, Haigh notes that by all logical reasoning, the study would be at least one year after full implementation, so sometime in 2014. “A reversal of rules would obviously come much later. By then, the damage may have already been done and the markets would have seen even wider gyrations in prices with the removal of liquidity,” he concludes.

Rounding things up, ABN-AMRO – the ‘once’ troubled Dutch bank is attempting to ‘re-establish’ its international presence to energy, commodities and transportation clients according to a communiqué issued from Amsterdam this morning. To this effect, a new office was opened in Dallas staffed by a 'highly regarded' energy banking team swiped from UBS. More offices are to follow in Moscow and Shanghai over the coming year on top of an existing network of 10 international offices. Lets see how the reboot goes!

© Gaurav Sharma 2011. Photo: North Sea oil rig © Cairn Energy Plc

BP’s profit, Saudi price targets & CNOOC in Canada

Its quarterly results time and there is only one place to start – an assessment of how BP’s finances are coping in wake of Macondo. Its quarterly data suggests the oil major made profits of US$5.3 billion in the three months to June-end. This is down marginally from the US$5.5 billion it made in Q1 2011 and a predictable reversal of the US$17 billion loss over the corresponding quarter last year when the cost of the Gulf of Mexico spill weighed on its books.

Elsewhere in the figures, BP's oil production was down 11% for the quarter on an annualised basis and the company has also sold US$25 billion worth of assets to date, partly to offset costs of the clean-up operation in the Gulf. City analysts told the Oilholic that BP should count itself lucky as the crude price has been largely favourable over the last 12 months.

Moving away from BP, it is worth turning our attention to the perennially crude question, what price of black gold is the Saudi Arabian Government comfortable with? An interesting report published by Riyadh-based Jadwa Investment suggests that the “breakeven” price for oil that matches actual revenues with expenditures is currently around US$84 per barrel for the Kingdom, comfortably below the global price.

The Oilholic agrees with the report’s authors - Brad Bourland and Paul Gamble – that it is bit rich to assume the Saudis crave perennially high oil prices. Au contraire, high oil prices actually hurt Saudi Arabia’s long term future. Bourland and Gamble feel the Kingdom would be more comfortable with prices below US$100 per barrel; actually a range of US$70-90 per barrel is more realistic.

Using either benchmark, prices are comfortably above the range and are likely to stay there for the rest of the year, if that is what the Saudis are comfortable with. Analysts at Société Générale CIB maintain their view for Brent prices to be in the US$110-120 range in H2 2011 on mixed fundamental and non-fundamental drivers. They note that there may be some slight upside to their Brent forecast, and some moderate downside to their WTI forecast. At 8:00 GMT, ICE Brent forward month futures contract was trading at US$118.04 and WTI at US$99.56.

Looking from a long term macroeconomic standpoint, the Jadwa Investment report notes that after the benign decade ahead, unless the current spending and oil trends are changed, Saudi Arabia faces a very different environment. For instance, domestic consumption of oil, now sold locally for an average of around US$10 per barrel, will reach 6.5 million barrels per day in 2030, exceeding oil export volumes. Jadwa Investment does not expect total Saudi oil production to rise above 11.5 million barrels per day by 2030.

Even with a projected slowdown in growth of government spending, the breakeven price for oil will be over a whopping US$320 per barrel in 2030. Furthermore, the Saudi government will be running budget deficits from 2014, which become substantial by the 2020s. By 2030, foreign assets will be drawn down to minimal levels and debt will be rising rapidly.

Before you go “Yikes”, preventing this outcome, according to Bourland and Gamble, requires tough policy reforms in areas such as domestic pricing of energy and taxation, an aggressive commitment to alternative energy sources, especially solar and nuclear power, and increasing the Kingdom’s share of global oil production. By no means a foregone conclusion, but not all that easy either.

Continuing with the Middle East, apart from crushing dissent and chastising the US government for interference, the Syrian government is apparently also open for crude business. In an announcement on July 7th, the creatively named General Establishment for Geology and Mineral Resources (GEGMR) under auspices of the Syrian Petroleum and Mineral Resources Ministry invited IOCs to bid and develop oil shale deposits in the Khanser region in the north. The Ministry says total crude reserves at the site are “estimated” at 39 billion tonnes with the oil content rate valuation at 5 to 11%.

While the tender books, costing US$3,000 each were issued on July 1st, the Ministry declined to answer how many were sold, who took them up and how the bid round is supposed to work in face of international condemnation of what is transpiring within its borders.

Elsewhere, Chinese state behemoth CNOOC’s recent acquisition of a 100% stake in OPTI Canada Inc, a TSX-listed oil sands producer, made the headlines. The aggregate consideration for the transaction is about US$2.1 billion. OPTI owns a 35% working interest in four oil sands projects in Canada – Long Lake, Kinosis, Leismer and Cottonwood.

Kai Hu, Vice President and Senior Analyst at Moody’s, says "CNOOC investment in this transaction is in line with the company's strategy of growing reserves, partly through overseas acquisitions. This investment – as well as its the previous investments in Eagle Ford and Niobrara shale gas projects – indicate its strong interest in gaining experience in unconventional oil and gas reserves.”

As such, Moody’s feels CNOOC Aa3 issuer and senior unsecured ratings will not be immediately affected by its acquisition. It also helps that there are no US-style murmurings of dissent in Canadian political circles.

© Gaurav Sharma 2011. Photo: Pipeline in Alaska © Kenneth Garrett, National Geographic

ConocoPhillips’ move is a sign of crude times

US major ConocoPhillips' announcement last Friday that it will be pursuing the separation of its exploration and production (E&P) and refining and marketing (R&M) businesses into two separate publicly traded corporations via a tax-free spin-off R&M to COP shareholders does not surprise the Oilholic. 

Rather, it is a sign of crude times. Oil majors are increasing turning their focus to the high risk, high reward E&P side of things rather than the R&M business where margins albeit recovering at the moment, continue to be abysmal. Most oil majors  are divesting their refinery assets, and even BP would have done so, regardless of the Macondo tragedy forcing its hand towards divestment. 

ConocoPhillips’ decision should not be interpreted as a move away from R&M – nothing in the oil business is either that simple or linear. However, it certainly tells us where its priorities currently lie and how it feels the integrated model is not the best way forward. This is in line with industry trends as the Oilholic noted last November. 

Meanwhile, following the announcement, ratings agency Moody's says it may review ConocoPhillips' ratings for possible downgrade with approximately US$19.6 billion of rated debt being affected. This includes A1 senior unsecured and other long-term debt ratings of the parent company and its rated subsidiaries. 

Tom Coleman, Moody's Senior Vice-President notes that the distribution to shareholders of the large R&M business could weaken the credit profile of ConocoPhillips and result in a downgrade of its A1 rating. 

"Our review will focus on the company's capital structure following the spin-off, including the potential for debt reduction by ConocoPhillips, along with its financial policies and growth objectives going forward as a stand-alone E&P company," he concludes. 

The wider market is waiting to get a clearer understanding of the oil major’s plans for debt reduction, capital structure and financial policies as an independent E&P. Continuing with corporate deals, BHP Billiton made a strategic swoop for Petrohawk Energy. The cash acquisition, also announced last Friday, to the tune of US$12.1 billion, will give it access to shale oil and gas assets across Texas and Louisiana. BHP’s latest move follows its earlier decision to buy Chesapeake Energy's Arkansas-based gas business for US$4.75 billion. 

Meanwhile, figures released by Brazil’s Petrobras for the month of June indicate that the company’s domestic production rose 3.5% on an annualised basis. The results were boosted by the resumption of production on platforms that had been undergoing scheduled maintenance in the Campos Basin, and startup of a new well connected to platform Jubarte field's P-57 in the Espírito Santo section of the Campos Basin. The Extended Well Test (EWT) in the Campos Basin's Aruanã field also started up in late June.

However, its international output was down 5.6% on an annualised basis due to operating issues and tax payments in Akpo, Nigeria. Petrobras' average oil and natural gas production (both domestic and overseas) amounted to 2,641,508 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed), 2.13% up on the total figure for May 2011. 

Finally, European woes are weighing on the crude markets. With the NYMEX August crude futures contract due to expire on Wednesday, intraday trading at one point, 1045 GMT to be precise, saw it down 0.31% or 33 cents at US$96.91 a barrel. Concurrently, the September ICE Brent futures contract was down 0.6%, 74 cents at US$116.44 a barrel. 

© Gaurav Sharma 2011. Photo 1: COP Refinery & Oil Platform collage © ConocoPhillips

From a Sobering August to Sept's Crude Forecast!

August has been a sobering month of sorts for the crude market. Overall, the average drop in WTI crude for the month was well above 8% and the premium between Brent crude and WTI crude futures contracts averaged about US$2. The market perhaps needed a tempering of expectations; poor economic data and fears of a double-dip recession did just that.

Even healthy US jobs data released last week could not stem the decline; though prices did recover by about 2% towards the end of last week. On Friday, the crude contract for October delivery lost 0.6% or US$0.41 to $74.60 a barrel on NYMEX. This is by no means a full blown slump (yet!) given that last week’s US EIA report was bearish for crude. It suggests that stocks built-up by 3.4 million barrels, a figure which was above market consensus but less than that published by the API. This is reflected in the current level of crude oil prices.

Looking specifically at ICE Brent crude oil futures, technical analysts remain mildly bullish in general predicting a pause and then a recovery over the next three weeks. In an investment note discussing the ICE Brent crude oil contract for October delivery, Société Générale CIB commodities technical analyst Stephanie Aymés notes that at first the market should drift lower but US$74.40/73.90 will hold and the recovery will resume to 77.20 and 77.70/78.00 or even 78.80 (Click chart above).

On the NYMEX WTI forward month futures contract, Aymés also sees a recovery. “73.40 more importantly 72.60 will hold, a further recovery will develop to 75.55/90 and 76.45 or even 77.05/77.25,” she notes. By and large, technical charts from Société Générale or elsewhere are not terribly exciting at the moment with the price still generally trading pretty much within the US$70-80 range.

Elsewhere in the crude world, here is a brilliant article from BBC reporter Konstantin Rozhnov on how Russia’s recently announced privatisation drive is sparking fears of a return to the Yeltsin era sale of assets.

On a crudely related note, after a series of delays, Brazil’s Petrobras finally unveiled its plans to sell up to US$64.5 billion of new common and preference stock in one of the largest public share offerings in the world.

A company spokeswoman said on Friday that the price of new shares would be announced on September 23rd. The IPO could well be expanded from US$64.5 billion to US$74.7 billion subject to demand; though initially Petrobras would issue 2.17 billion common shares and 1.58 billion preferred shares. The share capital will finance development of offshore drilling in the country’s territorial waters.

Lastly, the US Navy and BP said late on Sunday that the Macondo well which spilled over 200 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico poses no further risk to the environment. Admiral Thad Allen, a US official leading the government’s efforts, made the announcement after engineers replaced a damaged valve on the sea bed.

Concurrently, The Sunday Times reported that BP had raised the target for its asset sales from US$30 billion to US$ 40 billion to cover the rising clean-up cost of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The paper, citing unnamed sources, also claimed that BP was revisiting the idea of selling a stake in its Alaskan assets.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Graphics © SGCIB / CQG Inc. Photo: Alaska, US © Kenneth Garrett / National Geographic Society

Cairn Energy: Choosing Greenland over India?

It seems Cairn Energy has shifted its attention from India to Greenland. What else can be said of the Edinburgh-based independent upstream upstart’s announcement of plans to sell a 51% stake in its Indian operations to mining group Vedanta for up to US$8.5 billion?

After a week of nudges and winks, Cairn confirmed rumours of the sale doing the rounds in the city of London. The company’s Indian operations have a market capitalisation of just over US$14 billion which makes Cairn India, the country’s fourth largest oil company.

Apart from seeking a "substantial return of cash" to shareholders, it is now clear that Cairn hopes to pursue its drilling ambitions in Greenland with some vigour. In a media statement, Cairn’s chief executive Sir Bill Gammell said, “I am delighted to announce the proposed disposal of a significant shareholding in Cairn India in line with our objective of adding and realising value for shareholders.”

To fathom what the announcement means for Cairn energy is easy. In fact, market analysts I have spoken to reckon the sale would generate more than adequate capital for Cairn's Greenland prospection in the medium term. This makes Cairn pretty cash rich and the market wonders what the inimitable Bill Gammell has up his sleeve. That it could bag another similarly scaled production asset akin to its fields in India’s Rajasthan state is doubtful.

Working out what the deal means for Vedanta is trickier. Its chief executive Anil Agarwal gave a rather simplistic explanation. In a statement he said, “The proposed acquisition significantly enhances Vedanta's position as a natural resources champion in India. Cairn India's Rajasthan asset is world class in terms of scale and cost, delivering strong and growing cash flow.”

Hence, simply put Vedanta has stated its intentions of venturing beyond metals and make a headline grabbing foray into the oil and gas sector. The market would be watching how the two aspects of the business gel under the Vedanta umbrella, but there are precedents of success – most notably at BHP Billiton.

In a related development, Cairn energy was featured in Deloitte’s half-yearly assessment of UK independent oil and gas companies. At the end of H1 2010, according to Deloitte the top five UK independent oil companies by market capitalisation were - Tullow Oil, Cairn Energy, Premier Oil, SOCO International and Heritage Oil in that order. The top three have maintained their respective positions from December 2009 while SOCO International entered the top five with a 31% increase in market capitalisation.

Overall, the first half of the year was broadly positive for the UK independents, with market capitalisation of the majority of companies in the league table increasing by 4.6% over the 6 month period to 30 June 2010. It stood at £26.482 billion as of end-June. (Click box on the left for the entire list)

On the oil price front, the crude stuff plummeted nearly 7% over the course of the week ended Fri 13th on either side of the pond. The price resistance is presently above US$75 a barrel and I expect it to remain there despite some pretty disappointing economic data doing the rounds these days. Looking further ahead, analysts at Société Générale’s Cross Asset Research team forecast NYMEX WTI to average US$80 in Q3 2010 (revised down by $10) and $85 in Q4 2010 (revised down by $5).

Looking further ahead, an investment note states that they expect NYMEX WTI of US$92.30 in 2011 (revised down by $8.70). NYMEX WTI is forecast at US$88.30/$87.50 in Q1 2011/Q2 2011, increasing to $95/$98.30 in Q3 2011/Q4 2011. On a monthly average basis, Société Générale expects NYMEX WTI of US$87.50 in December 2010 and $100 in December 2011.

In truth, fear of a double dip recession persists in wider market, especially in the US, EU and UK. However, many crude traders are quietly confident that in such an event, India and China’s crude oil consumption will help maintain the oil price at US$70 plus levels.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo courtesy © Cairn Energy Plc. Chart Courtesy © Deloitte LLP

Crude Dips but Total Warns of Year-end Price Spike

Crude prices dipped yet again last week, especially towards the end of the week, as bearish trends witnessed in the wider financial markets clobbered commodities. Additionally, the US Department of Energy reported a 1.9 million barrel peak-to-trough decline of crude oil inventories (gasoline and distillate inventories both rose).

The drawdown was above expectations and NYMEX WTI August contract fell 30 cents to US$75.64 a barrel in New York following publication of the report. In fact, crude prices, instead of being the exception, were following the norm as commodities in general suffered their first negative quarter since 2008, if the past three months are anything to go by.

Problem these days is that higher institutional investor participation in commodities markets has without a shadow of doubt, at least in my mind, increased the connection between forex carry trade and stock market fluctuations with commodity assets. Still, most oil market commentators I have spoken to forecast crude prices as well as commodities prices to reverse last week’s losses as the supply and demand scenario has not been fundamentally altered. In fact, it remains strong.

However, Christophe de Margerie, CEO of oil major Total believes crude prices could spike on account of an entirely different reason – the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, he said that while it remained necessary to drill in deep waters to meet global demand for fuel, tougher safety rules could result in higher crude price.

"Total’s policy is clearly towards zero risk. All this means potential additional costs," de Margerie said, adding that oil prices could reach US$90 a barrel by end-2010.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo courtesy © Cairn Energy Plc

Is Brent Winning Battle of the Indices?

Is London’s Brent Crude winning the battle of the indices? David Peniket, President and Chief Operating Officer of Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Futures Europe, certainly seems to think so.

Speaking at the Reuters Global World Energy Summit on May 27th, Peniket said, “Brent is the global oil benchmark. Brent is used as the price benchmark for around two-thirds of the world's traded oil. It reflects the fundamentals of the oil market on a global basis and we're seeing Brent used as part of the pricing for oil throughout the world.”

Looking ahead, he added that based on “ongoing” growth in Asia, ICE currently expects Asian market participants to use Brent to hedge their risk rather than other benchmarks.

WTI Volumes traded on the NYMEX are far higher than those of Brent on ICE but Peniket said that from 2008 to 2009 Brent grew by 8% in volume terms while WTI grew 2%. Over Q1 2010, Brent grew by 34% while NYMEX WTI grew by 8%.

He declined comment on when he thought ICE Brent volumes may exceed WTI on NYMEX but said that, “Brent is a seaborne crude; it's at a point of the world where crude oil can move around and it can act as a point of arbitrage between different crude grades. Clearly WTI is an important US benchmark but I don't think it reflects the fundamentals of the global oil market in the way that Brent reflects them.”

Elsewhere in the summit, Reuters reported that top bosses of several leading commodities exchange, including Peniket, expressed their common view that speculation has not caused extreme volatility in oil prices and the efforts by state regulators in various markets are unwise to say the least. That will hardly convince politicians seeking capital and a largely sceptical wider public opinion, most notably in the US.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © Royal Dutch Shell

The Crude Month of May!

The month of May was an extraordinary one for those following crude price fluctuations. Cumulatively speaking, both the major oil futures markets saw the oil price tumble by nearly a fifth since April 30. Over the last fortnight, the price of oil closed below US$70 a barrel for the first time in 2010 driven down by the Greek debt crisis as well as US inventory build-up.

However, between May 26 and 28, the market witnessed a spectacular rebound when the NYMEX contract for July spiked nearly $7 a barrel. Hence, the weekly rise on the back of a healthy 48 hours came in at 5.6% or $3.93 a barrel. Impressive as it may appear, several market commentators I spoke to on the day seemed reluctant to rule out fresh lows over the course of next week (and well into June).

There’s plenty to spook the markets – Greece debt crisis, the Euro’s woes as a result of it, Spain’s recent debt ratings downgrade and US consumer spending. Brent’s premium to NYMEX, which was markedly visible mid-May, also disappeared by Friday.

Predictably, near-term futures contracts are trading at a discount to more-distant contracts. Prices for the most actively traded NYMEX futures contract fell 14.1% or $12.18 in May, the worst month on record since December 2008. Concurrently, over the same period, the front-month Brent crude contract fell 15.4% or $13.42 a barrel, the highest monthly decline since November 2008.

Overall, May was a tough old month for energy futures in general, with perhaps the notable exception of Natural Gas. Expect more of the same in June.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Chart Courtesy © Digital Look/BBC

Credit Suisse Revises Oil Price Estimates

Credit Suisse revised its oil price estimates this month. On April 15, in a note to investors, the Swiss bank raised its 2010 oil price estimate from US$70 per barrel to $82.90. Concurrently, the 2011 estimate was raised from $70 to $80. CS analysts noted that $80 per barrel provides “a better balance of an oil price which encourages marginal investment in new production, without crimping demand during the economic recovery phase, than (our) previous forecast of $70 per barrel.”

In a related development, four days later, Bank of America Merrill Lynch noted that the spike in oil prices from $80 per barrel to $87 per barrel came along with a rapid deterioration in the term structure of the WTI market. BoA-ML analysts feel that a surge in demand for storage, as spot oil prices rally, is an unusual event. They suggest that further oil price appreciation is unlikely in the short run.

“Rising on-shore stocks around Cushing, more floating storage in the Middle East, additional non-OPEC crude oil and a partial shutdown of European air space (last week) will likely limit further oil price advances near term. We thus maintain our second quarter 2010 average Brent and WTI crude oil price forecast of $83 per barrel. Looking ahead, we remain structurally bullish and still believe in our average $92 per barrel WTI crude oil forecast for the second half of 2010,” they noted further.

Meanwhile quarterly profits at UK oil giant BP more than doubled in year over year terms, according to results published earlier today. Replacement cost profit for January to March 2010 was $5.6 billion, compared with $2.4 billion for the first quarter of 2009. The figure is also up from the $3.45 billion in profit noted over the fourth quarter of 2009.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © BP Plc

OPEC Holds Production as Crude Nears $82.50

In line with market expectations, oil cartel OPEC held its current daily production output quota at 24.845 million barrels following the conclusion of its meeting in Vienna.

In a statement the cartel noted that production increases among oil exporting countries that were not part of OPEC would offset rising global demand for oil. Clarifying its stand, OPEC said that although world oil demand is projected to increase marginally during the year, this rise will be more than offset by the expected increase in non-OPEC supply, meaning that 2010 is likely to witness a decline in the demand for OPEC crude oil for the third consecutive year.

The cartel added that the persistently high OECD stock levels (estimated to currently stand at 59-61 days of forward cover i.e. well above their five-year average) indicate that there has been a contra-seasonal stock build in the first quarter 2010 and the overhang in terms of forward cover is expected to continue throughout the year.

Furthermore, market commentators also believe that OPEC member nations already flout their set quota cap. Overall compliance of quotas is thought to be in the circa of 52% to 58% depending on whom you speak to in the City.

OPEC president, Germanico Pinto, said that while an improvement was seen in the oil market outlook in recent months, there was some way to go before the cartel could feel at ease with the situation. In case the markets get unstable, the cartel stands ready, “to swiftly respond to any developments which might place oil market stability in jeopardy.”

Despite the predictability of the announcement, markets responded with a customary spike largely fuelled by a weaker U.S. Dollar. NYMEX light sweet crude was up 77 cents at $82.47 a barrel, nearing the $82.50 barrier. Concurrently, in London Brent crude was up by 72 cents to $81.25 a barrel on ICE Europe. Next meeting of the cartel is set for Oct 14, 2010 in Vienna.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © Royal Dutch Shell

Adios Cheap Oil, Says Shell's CEO

As the crude oil price lurks around its 52-week high of $83.25 a barrel, one cannot but help thinking about what CEO of Royal Dutch Shell Peter Voser said earlier this month. Speaking at the Wall Street Journal’s ECO:nomics conference in California on March 4, Voser told delegates, "I think what is dead is cheap oil. There is sufficient oil around but producers will have to spend more to get it. And I think you'll see that in the end price for consumers."

Debunking the “Peak Oil” hypothesis, Voser said that by 2050 around 40% of cars worldwide will be electric leaving some two-thirds still running on oil. “We will need conventional oil for the foreseeable future,” he added.

Oil futures gained over 2% last week, on the back of positive U.S. jobs data and healthy market feedback on Chinese and Indian economic growth. According to an investors note sent out to clients, analysts at Commerzbank AG believe the price of oil could exceed the current trading circa of $70 to $82 a barrel.

Earlier today, the crude contract for April delivery rose to an intraday high of $82.47 a barrel on the NYMEX before being tempered by a rising U.S. dollar, with the ongoing Greek debt tragedy continuing to weigh on the Euro. At 17:15 GMT, NYMEX crude contract for April delivery was up 10 cents or 0.12% at $81.51 a barrel. Concurrently, London Brent crude contract was trading at $80.35 up 11 cents or 0.14%.

Classic problem for forecasters is that direction of the economy and currency fluctuation aside, ETFs have more or less converted investing in commodities into a pseudo asset class. Hence, retail investors could de facto bet on commodities consumption patterns of emerging economies by investing (or divesting) in commodities, especially oil, via ETFs.

Oil has always been the vanguard of the commodities bubble. Excluding, London and Singapore markets, in 2003, ratio of paper barrels traded to physical barrels traded on NYMEX stood at 6:1. By 2008, the figure had risen to 19:1 and continues to rise, according to industry sources. Now imagine adding London and Singapore markets to the ratios?

It is a no-brainer that anyone who holds a paper barrel hopes to profit from it and few have any intention whatsoever of ever taking an actual delivery of oil. I feel it is prudent to mention that I am not joining the “Hate Speculators Club”. While supply and demand scenarios should (and in most cases do) dictate market movements, there’s more than one reason why cheap oil’s dead.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © Royal Dutch Shell

Crude Price Seen Factoring In Survey Data

Crude oil futures rose over 3% on average in week over week terms and for a change that is not chiefly down to a stand-alone argument that black gold is higher because the commodity is cheaper in U.S. Dollar terms.

To be fair, the 5-day cycle I examine began with the usual market conjecture over the position of the dollar. However, survey evidence indicates that manufacturing activity is picking-up. This morning, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve said its index of manufacturing activity rose to 17.6 in February from 15.2 in January; a sixth consecutive monthly rise. Across the pond, UK’s Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) reported its biggest monthly increase in auto production in year over year terms since May 1976. It said 101,190 cars were produced in January, up from 85,316 in December.

Trawling back the economic calendar, manufacturing purchasing managers’ indices (PMI) on either side of the pond are positive, especially the Eurozone PMI released on February 1st. It came in at 52.4 for January, versus 51.6 at the end of 2009; the highest level in two years. Admittedly, difference between the zone’s healthiest and weakest economies is widening, but overall picture is improving. Furthermore, Indian and Chinese economic activity remains buoyant. Yet, market commentators correctly opine that global economy is not quite out of the woods yet. From a British standpoint, Kate Barker, a member of the Bank of England’s rate setting monetary policy committee, summed up the City of London’s fears best in an interview with the Belfast Newsletter.

“Do I think that it’s possible we (in the UK) will have another quarter of negative production at some point? I do think it’s possible and I think the recovery will be quite hesitant but I wouldn’t necessarily describe that as a double dip,” Baker said.

That argument could be used for a number of OECD economies which have emerged from the recession over the last two quarters. Not to mention that Spain is yet to come out of a recession. David Moore, Chief Commodities Strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia, sees a gradual rebound in economic activity as the recovery takes hold which would then reflect in crude oil consumption patterns supporting crude prices to the upside.

Energy markets have always had to contend with volatility and that will not change. As Greece’s debt weighs on the Euro, the Dollar is seen strengthening which would in turn have a bearing upon crude prices. Moore opines that had the Dollar not strengthened against the Euro, crude oil price seen this week would have been even higher than current levels.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and American Petroleum Institute (API) data did not really temper this morning’s climb. A few hours ago, the EIA said U.S. crude inventories rose by 3.1 million barrels over the week ending February 12, while the API said late on Wednesday that crude supplies declined by 63,000 barrels last week. However, it also reported that gasoline stocks rose by 1.4 million barrels over the corresponding period.

Following the EIA data, NYMEX crude contract for March settlement stood at $78.15 up 84 cents or 1.09% at 17:00 GMT, trading in the circa of 76.32 to 78.71. Across the pond, London Brent Crude’s April settlement contract stood at $76.03 up 66 cents or 0.87% trading in the circa of $75.27 to $77.65. The Dollar’s strength remains a factor, but there are others to consider too.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © BP Plc

Oil Giants' Crude Quarter has a Common Theme

The last quarter was very ‘crude’ for the oil industry’s books. Fourth quarter results of three oil majors – namely Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Exxon Mobil make-up for some interesting reading with one common theme. Beginning with Exxon Mobil, the American oil behemoth reported on February 1st, 2010 that its fourth quarter profit dipped 23%. The decline meant it made a net profit of $6.05 billion over Q4 2009, compared to a $7.82 billion profit noted over the corresponding period last year. For the whole of 2009, Exxon's profit stood at $19.3 billion, less than half of what it made in 2008, and the lowest in seven years.

Then on February 2nd, BP said its Q4 2009 profits were up 33% to $3.45 billion. However, its annual profit was down 45% with the replacement cost profit at $13.96 billion compared to $25.59 billion in 2008. Two days later, on February 4th, Royal Dutch Shell’s profits for Q4 2009 came in at $1.2 billion, down by a whopping 75% from the $4.8 billion the Anglo-Dutch oil giant made over the corresponding quarter last year.

For the whole of 2009, Shell made a dwarfed $9.8 billion in profits, compared to $31.4 billion it made in profits over 2008. All three oil majors found common ground in suggesting that a global slump in demand courtesy of the economic climate and a dip in oil prices were to be blamed for their relatively poor set(s) of quarterly results. All three, in addition to many of their industry peers, added that the outlook for 2010 was uncertain.

In the midst of all this, OPEC secretary general Abdalla Salem El-Badri told the BBC that its members’ compliance with set production targets fell to 55-56% in January compared to 80% noted over the corresponding month last year. He described the development as "worrying".

El-Badri further said, "The risk is you see a lot of oil in the market and no one is buying it. Then the price will come down." At its last meeting in Angola on December 22nd (2009), OPEC held output at 24.84 million barrels per day.

OPEC and oil companies seem to bring up the word “uncertain” with some degree of conviction these days, more so because forecasting consumption patterns is proving to be mighty hard. Chinese and Indian consumption patterns and sluggish recovery in the West complicates drawing an overall global picture even further.

As for the prevailing price of black gold, NYMEX crude contract for March settlement was up 79 cents, or 1.10% trading at $72.67 a barrel and in the circa of $71.32 to $73.04 per barrel at 15:04 GMT. The corresponding Brent crude contract was up 87 cents, or 1.27 %, to $69.98 a barrel, trading in the circa of $69.61 to $71.30 in London. Overall, it’s still a far cry from a $147 per barrel price of July 2008. Many wonder for how long, but for very different reasons.

© Gaurav Sharma 2010. Photo Courtesy © Cairn Energy Plc