Murban futures launch, OPEC+ and Q1 2021

The first crude quarter of 2021 threw up a number of interesting developments for the oil markets, from fluctuating price sentiments to a divergence of views on the global supply-demand dynamic. More on market permutations later, but the Oilholic would like to kick-off this post by flagging a historic development that carries the potential of bringing about profound changes to the crude futures market – the launch of the Murban Futures contract.

It had been long-time coming with ambitions for the contract launch first surfacing early in 2019, and official confirmation arriving later that year. Market upheaval caused by the Covid-19 pandemic pushed the launch forward to 2021, when on March 29 the contract launched with a debut price of $63.43 per barrel. 

And with it history was made – Murban, traded on IntercontinentalExchange Futures Abu Dhabi, is the world's first futures contract predicated on the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company's (ADNOC) flagship onshore crude oil. It means the offered market positions are directly linked to a major regional production centre. 

Alongside ADNOC as its backer, are nine of the world's largest energy traders including BP, ENEOS, GS Caltex, INPEX, PetroChina, PTT, Shell, Total and Vitol. Their hope is that physical oil traders use it as a benchmark, and price quality differentials off it accordingly as is the case with Brent. If physical traders are convinced that the new benchmark is reasonably liquid, it would take liquidity away from WTI, Brent and Dubai crude.

That is no mean feat and there have been previous false dawns in the region. To improve the odds of the benchmark's success, ADNOC has removed destination restrictions on the crude setting Murban apart from its regional competitors who have historically been bogged down by such limitations. And Asian refiners will now have a direct means to hedge against shifts in the price of Murban, rather than using derivatives linked to Dubai crude.

Of late, ADNOC’s production levels have averaged above 2 million bpd, with half of it set aside for the export market. In Fujairah - the main delivery point for Murban - ADNOC is currently building underground storage caverns that will be able to hold 42 million barrels of crude, including Murban. This will further strengthen the physical barrel underpinning of Murban futures. All in all, a very noteworthy development that carries a reasonably high chance of success over the coming years. Here's the Oilholic’s more detailed take on the development via Forbes.

Switching tack from the debut of Murban futures to the crude world in general, bullish sentiment that took hold in November 2020 has catapulted oil prices from $40 to $60-plus levels for both Brent and WTI. There's now chatter of $100 per barrel medium-term prices and a spike to even $190 in certain circumstances if you are to believe JPMorgan. 

This is nothing short barmy chatter by the longs and is wildly optimistic. In terms of reconciling expected crude oil demand in a post-Covid world versus supply, the Oilholic reckons the paper market is running two to three quarters, or around $5 per barrel, ahead of the physical market. 

Economic output in key markets remains sluggish, while the International Energy Agency (IEA) does not expect crude demand to catch up with supply until the third quarter of 2021. As for OPEC+, while its market calls on March 4 and April 1 have been described as bullish, they are in truth really bearish. 

On March 4, OPEC+'s headline production cut level was pegged at 7 million bpd, along with an additional and surprising voluntary cut of 1 million bpd by Saudi Arabia alone. However, Russia and Kazakhstan were allowed to marginally increase their output to keep the OPEC+ peace.

And on April 1, OPEC+ said an additional 350,000 bpd will be added to production, with another 350,000 in June. From July, output will be increased by 450,000 bpd. Both OPEC+ announcements cheered the bulls. However, the market remains in real danger of getting ahead itself. That’s all for the moment folks! Keep reading, keep it crude!

To follow The Oilholic on Twitter click here.

To follow The Oilholic on Forbes click here.

To follow The Oilholic on Rigzone click here.

To email: journalist_gsharma@yahoo.co.uk 

© Gaurav Sharma 2021. Photo: Kristina Kasputienė from Pixabay

Fujairah’s new VLCC jetty, oil benchmarks & more

The Oilholic finds himself roughly 3,500 miles south east of London, in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, for a speaking engagement at the Gulf Intelligence Energy Markets Forum 2016. 

However, before proceedings began at the event, the Emirate’s administration took the occasion to launch its first Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) jetty, built at a cost of AED 650 million (£137m, $177m), with the construction of a second jetty already underway. In sync with the launch, VLCC Kelly, part of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company fleet, moored at the jetty (see above left).

The move, a part of Fujairah’s drive to catch-up with Singapore as a major oil storage hub on the so-called South-South energy shipping corridor, was accompanied by global price aggregator Platts announcing it would publish independent, outright price assessments for a range of oil products for the Middle East market on a FOB [Free-On-Board] Fujairah basis starting on 3 October, 2016.

The Port, for its part, will also publish weekly inventory data to improve transparency. With the likes of Vitol and Gulf Petrochem bolstering their presence in Fujairah, private tank storage capacity is tipped to exceed 14 million cubic metres by 2020, from an expected 9 million cubic metres by the end of 2016. That’s definitely something to mull over in terms of the global oil storage stakes, considering the fact that less than two decades ago all people saw when it came to Fujairah was a bunkering hub.

The events preceding provided the perfect setting and plenty of talking points for the EMF itself, which is growing bigger with each passing year; a testament to the Gulf Intelligence team. Yours truly, moderated two panels on key subjects – including the crucial need for Middle Eastern benchmarks and strategies for securing oil and gas sector finance amid oversupply.

Of course in the current climate, market discourse would not be complete without touching on the direction of the oil price. Readers of this blog are familiar with the Oilholic’s belief that the oil price is likely to be stuck in the $40-50 per barrel range, and would be no higher than that come the end of the year.

Given the current set of circumstances, we could in fact be stuck either side of $50 for much of 2017; a point one made forcefully at a lively EMF debate. 

Constantly lurking in background is possible cooperation between OPEC and Russia over the issue of freezing and/or cutting oil production. According to Iraq's governor to OPEC Falah Alamri, a featured speaker at the EMF, circumstances were right for oil producers to seal an output freeze deal.

"There was no deal in earlier attempts [in February and April in Doha] because the circumstances weren't right for producers to strike a deal. This time things are different because circumstances are little bit better and would help in reaching a deal," he told the audience. 

However, it’s not reaching a deal that would be the problem. The real problem will arise when the powers that be sit down and try to work out how to implement the deal! Overall, some lively conversations were held about the market direction with a broad spectrum of views. It was great being back here, but that’s all from the UAE folks! Keep reading, keep it crude! 

To follow The Oilholic on Twitter click here.
To follow The Oilholic on Google+ click here.
To follow The Oilholic on IBTimes UK click here.
To follow The Oilholic on Forbes click here.
To email: gaurav.sharma@oilholicssynonymous.com

© Gaurav Sharma 2016. Photo 1: VLCC Kelly moored at the Port of Fujairah, UAE. © Gaurav Sharma, September 2016. Photo 2: Gaurav Sharma (left) with Matt Stanley, Fuel Oil Broker at Freight Investor Services at the Energy Markets Forum 2016 © Gulf Intelligence.